logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.08.23 2013고단1274
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates the company, and is a person who is friendly with the victim D.

On January 16, 2013, the presiding judge instructed the non-party defendant's representative and the victim to leave the corridor in order to coordinate the proceedings in the process of trial due to the refund of the deposit for lease of apartment deposit within the jurisdiction of the government district civil district court No. 16 located in the Dong-dong, Dong-dong.

As above, the presiding judge’s instructions indicate that “I will not make a civil lawsuit before a third party, because I would like to borrow money,” the victim left the court and the victim sited in the audience seat,” and the Defendant franchising the victim’s spath, thereby causing injury to both spath, etc. in need of two weeks of treatment, by using the breast spath, in both hand, the breast spathn and the breast spathn in the upper part of the victim for about five minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness F or D's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused (including questioning the accused);

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Determination on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel as to the investigation report (the submission of photographs about the victim's injury)

1. The Defendant asserted that the victim was able to correct the victim D with a dular, and that the victim did not assault the victim by asserting that the victim was able to have a dular, and that it did not flick on the part of the victim. However, in full view of witness D, F’s legal statement, etc., considering the victim’s statement, the victim, who was the victim himself/herself, led to criticism to E in the court, and the victim was flick on both sides of the victim, and the victim was flick on the day of the instant case, and the victim was flick on January 18, 2013, and the victim was flick on the day of the instant case, and the victim was flick at the hospital on January 21, 2013.

arrow