1. The Defendant’s KRW 46,85,730 and KRW 46,510,140 among the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s KRW 12% per annum from August 29, 2015 to August 31, 2015.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as stated in Gap evidence 1 through 7, Eul concluded a credit guarantee agreement with the plaintiff on August 29, 2008, when the plaintiff performs its surety obligation, it agreed to pay the plaintiff the amount of subrogation and the interest rate fixed by the plaintiff (from 12% a year to 8% a year from September 1, 2015 to 5% a year), additional guarantee fees, etc. The defendant provided joint and several surety for the plaintiff Eul's above obligation; Eul borrowed 50,000 won for ordinary house loans from the Korean bank on September 4, 2008 to 15. 1. 5% a total of 1. 5% a deposit, 40,000 won a house loan from the above 1. 5% a deposit, 50,000 won a house loan from the above 1. 5% a deposit, 40,500 won a house loan from the National Housing Fund under the above credit guarantee agreement, 405% a loan from the above 505% a loan.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition by admitting it.