1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial at the court of first instance, when filing an appeal, do not differ significantly from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial at the court of first instance. However, as a result of the fact-finding on the Plaintiff’s 39 and 40 additional documents submitted at the court of first instance, and the head of the relevant university affiliated with the Ganman University at the court of first instance, the relevant fact-finding reply sheet regarding the relevant hospital’s neurologists, and ① the Plaintiff’s brain color is determined to be brain flachip by the dynamic flachip., which can be said to be a normal aging phenomenon arising from the blood transfusion.

(2) There is no clear medical basis that changes in the working environment or performance of duties directly affect the outbreak of brain emergencies.

③ If the result of the Plaintiff’s health examination is deemed only a bodily injury, it can be said that it is a normal blood pressure or a border high blood pressure.

Therefore, the patient with the blood pressure records in the above degree does not prescribe the blood pressure generally.

However, in the course of the medical examination and treatment of patients, the clinical doctors confirm whether the health foods that could affect the blood pressure are not taken, and at regular intervals, determine whether the blood pressure is normal or not after measuring more times the blood pressure at regular intervals.

④ The medical record appraisal statement submitted to the court of first instance stated that “the brain scamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscam

Accordingly, this Court has set aside this.