logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.14 2016나72983
대여금
Text

1. The part against Defendant B in the judgment of the first instance, including the claim extended in the trial, is as follows:

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

A. Comprehensively taking account of the Plaintiff’s purport (including the fact that there is no dispute) of the entire pleadings in the Plaintiff’s written evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the Plaintiff may be recognized that, around October 2014, the Plaintiff received the loan amount of KRW 70,000,000 from Defendant B to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant loan”) and the interest rate of KRW 1% per month on the instant loan, and the loan amount of KRW 10,000,000,000. The Plaintiff may pay the loan amount of KRW 2,000 to the Plaintiff by December 30, 2015. The Plaintiff’s loan amount of KRW 70,000,000 (hereinafter “the loan amount of this case”). As such, Defendant B has an obligation to pay the Plaintiff the interest and delay damages remaining after paying the loan amount of KRW 70,00,000 as follows.

B. Defendant B’s assertion that: (a) Defendant B paid all interest on the instant loan obligation until July 2015; and (b) paid a total of KRW 22,00,00,000 as the principal repayment; (c) Defendant B’s instant loan obligation against the Plaintiff remains at KRW 48,00,000 (=70,000,000 - 22,000,000) and interest or delay damages after July 2015. Accordingly, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff still remains at KRW 22,00,000,000,000 paid from Defendant B in the order of the interest, delay damages, and original amount of the instant loan obligation; and (d) the Plaintiff’s loan obligation against Defendant B remains at KRW 61,00,000 as the principal repayment; and (e) the Plaintiff’s loan obligation from KRW 200,000,000 to KRW 310,000,000; and (e) the Plaintiff’s evidence 20131 to 6.2013.2.

arrow