The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (the imprisonment of four months, the suspension of execution of two years, the observation of protection, and the fine of five hundred thousand won) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant does not have much value of public goods that the defendant walked.

However, this case enters the sobann Police Station for the defendant

In order to establish public power, strict enforcement of law on such a crime is required.

Defendant has been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to the same crime, and there are other criminal records of several times of violence.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of the instant case, and the scope of recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.