1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for the court's explanation as to this case are as follows: (a) the statement of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (Evidence No. 10 to 16; hereinafter the same shall apply) is insufficient to recognize the defendants' assertion that the plaintiff Gap agreed to lease each of the real estate of this case to the defendants for not less than 20 years; and (b) there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the defendants' assertion is not accepted; (c) after the 13th "Stop", the land lease period for the purpose of the ownership of buildings or other structures is expired (Article 643 of the Civil Act); (d) in order to recognize the right to purchase the land of this case, the lease period for the purpose of the ownership of buildings or other structures should be from 10 to 300,000,000 to 60,000,0000 won and 6,000 won and 7,000,000 won and 6,000 won and 7,00,0.1.

or the increase in the value of such property.

It is insufficient to recognize that the Defendants managed each of the instant lands upon delegation by Plaintiff A, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

. The above.