logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.02.07 2016고정1626
모욕
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won, and by a fine of 500,000 won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

(b) Crime history;

1. Defendant A: (a) around 18:05 on April 7, 2016, the Defendant parked a passenger car in front of the G restaurant operated by the Defendant and the Defendant of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, with the first resident priority in front of the restaurant; (b) the victim H (n, 4* 3); (c) the Defendant parked a passenger car in front of the restaurant; and (d) the Defendant:

The next dismissal was called "Bara".

Accordingly, the injured party parked only a little time in the middle, and the guest deducteds the vehicle from the off. After about 15 minutes, the vehicle that found the above restaurant after about 15 minutes deducteds the victim and the defendant, but the victim did not immediately deduct the vehicle, but the defendant called "the deduction from the off-way and the deduction from the weather."

In addition, the victim made a defect in the street phone, and the Defendant 1 made a public insultd the victim by openly pointing out “the phone to cut off the son and the next son” while the cafeterias and the players are in the same place.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant: (a) at the above temporary location, insulting A, a birthee, expressed the victim’s desire to feel as above; and (b) the victim also called “the victim to get off the weather from the weather year;

S. There is a deduction of an A.I.D. from an A.I.D. and an A.I.D.

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by “”.

B. The Defendant expressed the above desire at the above temporary location, and then threatened the victim by giving the victim the crypted “the cryp stale I stalth number, and the cryp stale stale hym hyp hyp stal.”

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. The part concerning H’s statement in the prosecutor’s statement protocol against the Defendants

1. Statement made by the police with H [Defendant B]

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. The part concerning H’s statement in the prosecutor’s statement protocol against the Defendants

1. The written statement by the police of H [the Defendants, despite having agreed upon at the time of the instant case and decided to conclude the case, fall under Article 232(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act and Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and thus, Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow