logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.11.18 2015고단3935
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 17, 2015, the Defendant stated that at the F coffee shop located in Dongducheon-si, Dongducheon-si, the name of the owner of the “O site and the second floor detached house on the H site and its ground” as stated in the written indictment of the Victim G was before the transfer to the Defendant, but I and G were in this court that both I and G had already repaid the said site and house to G at the time of the occurrence of the instant case, so the victim of the instant case is identified as G.

In order for the defendant to purchase the above site and the second floor detached house in Dongcheon-si, and the second floor detached house in his lot number by collecting the claim against I, the owner of the second floor detached house in the above site and the second floor detached house, the defendant would purchase the above site and the second floor detached house in lieu of I. By March 24, 2015, the defendant would transfer ownership to the defendant's name until March 24, 2015, the above site and the second floor detached house and the second floor detached house in the above site and the second floor to the defendant's husband and the second floor detached house in J will lease the second floor and pay the above second floor detached house and 500 million won as the rental deposit received.

In addition, around March 21, 2015, at the victim’s house located in Dongducheon-si H, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would make a re-return without having divorced from South and North Korea.” The Defendant, who is suspected of having a relationship with the Defendant and her husband, concluded that the Defendant would make a joint payment for the security deposit received by leasing the above No. 401, currently living and for the security deposit received by leasing the above No. 401 and for the second floor and

However, the above J is owned by the Defendant. On March 2015, 201, the Defendant leased the above No. 401 to a police officer with the said J and home bit, and thus, it was not possible to pay part of the above KRW 500 million with the security deposit. Even if the said building site and the second floor detached house are granted a loan by establishing a mortgage on the said building site and the second floor detached house, the Defendant ought to pay KRW 42 million, which is the debt amount for L, the former husband.

arrow