logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.10 2016고단2067
경범죄처벌법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of 100,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 23, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) on December 23, 2015, the victim B, who was a taxi engineer, was boarding the taxi in front of Yeongdeungpo-gu Office, Young-si Office, and moved to the front of the DNA located in the permissible city; and (b) the Defendant did not pay KRW 12,120 of the taxi fee without justifiable grounds.

2. On December 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) did not pay the taxi fee in front of the D District E located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si on December 23, 2015; (b) visited D District; (c) did not pay the fare; (d) did so; and (e) did assault the F in such a manner that F was able to pay the fare and return back to the D District; and (e) did so, to the said F, “the f was hick down to death; (c) f was hick down to death; (d) f was hick down to death; and (e) the back part of the F’s back humf, the right humf was humfed once, and hick up the bridge; and (e) did assault by taking the humf over the bridge.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Witness B and each legal testimony of F;

1. Each police statement made against F and B;

1. The taxi fee receipt [the Defendant paid the taxi fee by card, and the Defendant did not interfere with official duties in the process of protesting against the illegal arrest by police officers at the police station.” All of the charges are denied.

However, in full view of the above evidence duly admitted to the testimony of the F, which is a taxi engineer B and the pertinent police officer, it is sufficient to find the Defendant guilty of committing the crime as stated in the facts charged in the instant case, and the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties, Selection of Imprisonment, and Selection of Punishment) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) 39 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (Unpaid taxi charges and Selection of Fines);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Article 38(1)3 of the Criminal Act 1.

arrow