1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 34,00,000, as well as 6% per annum from March 10, 2017 to July 10, 2018, and the next day.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant completed the registration of incorporation on January 17, 2008 as a housing reconstruction consolidation project association established in order to promote a reconstruction project in the B B of Dong-si.

B. On August 26, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a service contract with the Defendant with the following content, and received KRW 85,000,000 from the service cost around September 9, 2010.

o The scope of services: Affairs of support at a general meeting, affairs of authorization for the establishment of an association, affairs of authorization for changes, affairs of support for the implementation of a resolution, affairs of support for the case of request for sale, period of support for a case of invalidation of an association: the period of contract shall be from the time of

34,000,000 won when the separate payment date of the additional tax of KRW 170,000 for the total amount of 170,000 for the total amount of 170,000 for the total amount of 170,000 for the total amount of 20% for the contract, 51,000,000 won when the authorization for the change of the implementation of the project is applied for 30% when the authorization for the change of the implementation of the project is completed, 34,00,000 for 34

C. (1) On July 29, 2010, the Defendant decided to revise the project implementation plan at the extraordinary general meeting on July 29, 2010; however, the Defendant did not file an application for the authorization of the change of the project implementation plan with the competent Si/Gun/Gu Mayor due to the following reasons: (a) filing a lawsuit seeking the confirmation of the invalidation of the establishment of an association (transfer to this Court case 2009Da5237, 2009Gu

Dor. The defendant decided on May 19, 2012 that the change of the project execution plan was approved at the ordinary general meeting, but it was not applied for the change of the project execution plan between Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd. and union executives due to the reasons such as the demand for joint and several guarantee.

Fidelity was excluded from the service after June 2013.

In November 17, 2014, the defendant decided to revise the project implementation authorization and to select a management entity specialized in improvement projects at an ordinary general meeting.

At the time, Non-party 1 corporation was selected as a rearrangement project management contractor.

(v) the Defendant.