The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the circumstances that the court below rendered on the grounds of sentencing and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, it is deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is appropriate and too unreasonable, and it does not seem unfair. While the defendant led to the first instance court, it is difficult to see that such circumstance constitutes the sentencing ground to the extent that the sentence of the court below is mitigated.

Therefore, the defendant's argument that the above sentencing is unfair is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da36414, Jan. 11, 2016). However, as it is obvious that the Defendant’s appeal is a clerical error in the facts constituting the crime of the lower court’s judgment, “1. 10” under Article 25(1) of the Rules on