logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.05.18 2016가단8713
채무부존재확인
Text

1. A notary public against the plaintiff against the defendant shall make a promissory note No. 2721 dated May 27, 2005, No. 2005.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On May 27, 2005, the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 10,000,000 from the Defendant, a notary public drafted a promissory note No. 2721 of No. 2005 No. 2721 of the notarial deed (hereinafter “Notarial Deed”).

B. Around June 2005, the Defendant filed an application with the Gwangju District Court for the attachment and assignment of the claim amounting to KRW 10,000,000 out of the “Bongbuk-gu C Apartment-gu 207, 108,” with the Plaintiff’s Korea Land and Housing Corporation on the basis of the instant notarial deed, as the Gwangju District Court 2005TTT 4309, and the said court rendered a decision to accept the claim on June 8, 2005.

C. Since then, the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to terminate all claims based on the Notarial Deed of this case. Accordingly, on April 1, 2007, the defendant withdrawn the seizure of claims based on the claim seizure and assignment order against the Korea Land and Housing Corporation in Gwangju District Court 2005TTT No. 4309 and renounced the entire right.

Therefore, there is no obligation of KRW 10,000 based on the notarial deed of this case against the defendant, and there is no obligation based on the claim seizure and assignment order of the defendant against the Korean Land and Housing Corporation of Gwangju District Court 2005TTT 4309.

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow