logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.04.26 2014가단205307
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Defendant is a company that provides portal services based on search, community, etc. on the Internet, and provides online services, such as NATE, NAN, and cYORD. 2) The Plaintiffs provided personal information to the Defendant at the time of accession, including names, resident registration numbers, ID (ID), passwords, e-mail addresses, addresses, telephone numbers, etc.

B. 1) In the event of hacking incident, there is a piracy in which the identification presumed to be residing in China is unknown (hereinafter “instant piracy”).

around 00:40 on July 21, 201, the Defendant Database (hereinafter “DB”)

) Using the Commission’s reservation work on B’s computers, a staff member of A, distributed “N Rate.ex”, a malicious program with a function to attempt reverse connection, which is a voluntary domain name, which was created and offered by the instant seaer in advance, and contacted the Defendant’s information and communications network by remote connection with B’s computers, at a place where the location in China is unknown from July 26, 201 to July 27, 201, at a place where the location in China cannot be known. The instant seaer intruded the Defendant’s information and communications network at a place where the database is stored, the DNA server in which the DNA member information is stored, the DNA server in which the DNA member information is stored, and the DNA server in which the duplicate member information was stored (hereinafter each of the above DNA server).

) In case of intrusion upon the pertinent database and transmitting the personal information processed and stored in the database of the instant case to E.S. server (www.edut.co.co.k) where the “2. 36 December 211, 211” was assigned, the “the instant hacking incident” refers to the “the instant hacking incident.”

(2) The instant hacking incident revealed 34,954,887 personal information from among the members of the Nitart or Hashed, and the personal information leaked, the names, resident registration numbers, and the resident registration numbers of the aforementioned members.

arrow