1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The following facts may be acknowledged in accordance with the respective entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 12, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 (in the absence of special indication, including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings, and there shall be no counter-proofs:

On December 4, 2014, the Plaintiff was involved in an accident where sprinkling trees were to take a pipe (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

B. By March 31, 2015, the Plaintiff received medical care benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”) with respect to the salvinal sale of the coordinate (hereinafter “the instant wound”) and applied for disability benefits on June 9, 2016. On July 11, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition of disability benefit site payment on the ground that the salvinium remaining on the instant wound’s part constitutes a temporary club and the restriction on the exercise of the salpulare of the left-hand part falls short of the standards.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

The Plaintiff filed a petition for examination against the instant disposition. However, the Defendant dismissed the petition for examination around October 2016 on the ground that it did not suffer from permanent pains or functional disorders in the Section of the Bana on the part of the instant injury disease, thereby falling short of the criteria for recognition of disability grade.

The Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination, but was dismissed by the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee on December 8, 2016.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff asserted that the accident of this case caused injury to the left-hand sponser in the anti-sponsor, etc., and continued pain until now, and not only interfered with walking and daily life, but also labor activities.

The plaintiff has limited the exerciseable area of Section 1/4 or more due to the injury or disease of this case, which is set forth in Article 48 of the Enforcement Rule of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act as class 14 of the disability grade.