The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is a person who is unable to walk on the left-hand knee, and there is no fact that he/she has taken the victim C's left-hand knick as recorded in the facts charged.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the victim argued from the investigative agency to the court of the court below that "the defendant was driving a vehicle on behalf of the defendant, and the employee of the substitute driving company also argued that he was able to take the floor by telephone. At the time, the victim was seated in the driver's seat of the vehicle, but the defendant was able to take the seat of the driver's seat, but the defendant was able to take the seat of the driver's seat, and thereafter the defendant was able to take one time to take the seat of the driver's seat, and the defendant reported 112 to the victim. The victim reported 112, and thereafter the defendant reported 112 to the victim, the situation at the time of the crime, the damage, the damage, the part of the victim's body, etc. are consistently stated, and immediately after the case, the victim's statement was supported by the victim's statement, and the credibility of the victim's statement is not discovered.

On the other hand, the defendant stated in the written statement that he was "her her her her son", and it is not consistent with that statement, such as the victim's statement that he/she lost his/her her her her her son at the time of the investigation by the police once.

Therefore, since the facts charged in this case are sufficiently convicted, the judgment of the court below is not erroneous.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.