Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the pertinent part is modified or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Parts used or added;
A. On the 5th page of the first instance judgment, the following judgments are added.
B. According to the facts of recognition of the above liability for damages, the defendant C, who worked as a director of the defendant company, has infringed on the plaintiff's property right by reproducing the plaintiff's website, etc. on the defendant company's website and using it on the plaintiff's website. The defendant company is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages incurred by the defendant C, who is an employee, to the plaintiff with respect to the execution of the work. Each of the above liabilities of
B. On the 5th page of the first instance judgment, the “whether extinctive prescription expires” was “C. Determination on extinctive prescription defense.”
C. On No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following judgments were added between 11 and 3.
(1) In light of the contents and nature of the tort in this case, since Defendant C copied the company name on the Plaintiff’s website and used it as it is except for the change of the name of the company on the Plaintiff’s website to the Defendant company, it is clear that Defendant C’s act constitutes an act of infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright. It can be easily recognized that Defendant C, who was a director of the Defendant company, infringed on the Defendant company’s copyright regarding the execution of the business of the Defendant company,
(d)on the 6th sentence of the first instance court, the following judgments shall be added, followed by Act No. 13:
In addition, according to the evidence No. 13 and evidence No. 14-1, E, the representative director of the plaintiff, is the defendant around July 2, 2010.