1. The claim of this case is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

C. The Plaintiff and G G G G G G G G G GJ from August 9, 2010 to January 6, 201, in the form of money, reported to the Plaintiff and G G G G G by e-mail, which is consistent with the terms and conditions prescribed in Article 10 of the instant Work Convention.

③ It is apparent that the 691,612 bill is used as G’s operating fund, such as down payment of land for a factory in G.

(4) The 1,689,365 design used as construction expenses may be deemed as the operating expenses of G.

The Defendant was responsible for the registration of G ELS purchasing agency, because, in order to create the result of prior trade necessary for registration, G performed the contracted construction from ELS displays, E agreed to settle the accounts of the construction cost and profit invested by G and its settlement was made several times between G and E.

⑤ As a result of the settlement of accounts related to construction work 1 through 10 on December 16, 2010, G and E paid the proposal 724,365 to G.

(6) G and E settled the accounts on April 6, 201 based on the Fund Accounting Book (No. 10) prepared by the Defendant on April 6, 201, and the remaining 1,340,00 bills out of 11,340,90 bills out of the 1190 bills adjusted as follows, shall be paid to GIST. The sales price of LLD Pcha or 11-1-14, 11-1-14: 1,617, 369 bills out of the construction cost: 1,031,08 (No. 1,03,000), 20, 30, 70, 360, 70, 270, 30, 106, 370, 167, 15, 167, 367, 30, 167, 304, 167, 175, 167, 167

The defendant is against the plaintiff.