1. The defendant 8,00,600 won, 680, 600 won, 6,780,400 won, 8,004, 150 won, and 7.7.

1. Basic facts

(a) Business name - Business name - Project implementation authorization for a N Area Housing Redevelopment rearrangement project - Public announcement of project implementation authorization: The Seongbuk-gu Seoul on July 22, 2009 - Project implementer: the defendant;

B. Decision on expropriation made on July 24, 2015 by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City: The starting date of expropriation: September 11, 2015 - Each land owned by the Plaintiffs and its ground obstacles (hereinafter “instant land, etc.”) - Compensation for expropriation: The money indicated in the “adjudication on expropriation” column in attached Table 1.

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on May 26, 2016 – Expropriation compensation: Each money recorded in the column for “Objection” in the attached Table 1 attached hereto - additional charges: Each money recorded in the attached Table 2 [the amount claimed for additional charges for delay by a plaintiff] (=compensation for expropriation 】 33 days (from June 10, 2014 to May 8, 2015) 】 365 x 0.2 (the statutory interest rate under Article 3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings) / No dispute exists, and the entries in subparagraphs 1 through 4 and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The reasonable compensation for the land, etc. of this case for which the plaintiffs' claim for increase in the compensation for expropriation is filed is without dispute between the parties, and the plaintiffs are those who have received the money stated in the attached Table 1 attached hereto from the defendant. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay each money stated in the attached Table 1 attached hereto to the plaintiffs.

3. The plaintiff E’s family member of the plaintiff E’s claim for the cost of moving a house is three persons, and the legitimate cost of moving a house that the plaintiff E is obligated to receive is no dispute between the parties, and the plaintiff E is a person who has received 4,429,564 won as the cost of moving a house from the defendant. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay 1,300,774 won to the plaintiff E.

4. The plaintiffs' late payment additional charges

A. On April 8, 2014, the Plaintiffs asserted that the Defendant filed an application for adjudication on expropriation of the instant land, etc.

Therefore, the defendant is from the defendant.