The defendant is not guilty, and the purport of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. On August 19, 2017, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case: (a) around 00:45 on August 19, 2017 (where the time was not specified in the indictment, but the time was 00:45 hours during which the instant indictment was initiated; (b) according to the records, even if the ex officio correction is made, it does not seem to have any disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of the Defendant’s right of defense; (c) the Defendant received 112 reports to the effect that “I cut away from the Defendant’s age club,” and “I cut away from the Defendant’s wall” on the road in front of the Defendant’s age club located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, a police station affiliated with the Chungcheong Police Station, sent to the said site with conversations on the background of the instant case, and was removed from E during the course of taking the Defendant’s cell phone by using his cell phone, she took the left hand of the instant E, and made an assault by misunderstanding and assault.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the following facts are acknowledged:

① On August 19, 2017, the Defendant visited D's D't clubs located in Chungcheong City C, and d't d't d't d't d', and lost her d't d't d't d'.

(2) A defendant who has lost a wall at a police station.

The report was filed, and two police officers, such as E, belonging to the Chungcheong Police Station, were called the above age club.

At the request of the defendant, police officers searched the area around the seat where the defendant had left, but did not find out the wall of the defendant, and went out of the age club.

③ Police Officers E: (a) calculated the ex officio drinking value from Defendant F, the first executive of Defendant E; (b) the Defendant did not have calculated the drinking value; and (c) the Defendant sent the drinking value to China B, where more than one person was Chinese B, and the Defendant sent it to China.

‘A'.