A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Crimes committed on September 15, 2018;

A. On September 15, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the work, on September 15, 2018, came to fall under a trial with the victim and accommodation problem from the E-ray of the victim D operated in Daejeon Seodong-gu, Daejeon as of September 15, 2018, “Is the day of funeral”;

During about 30 minutes of disturbance, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bit, etc., the victim's burbur business was obstructed by force.

B. The Defendant, at the above date, at the above time and place, demanded that he leave from G in the circumstances where he belonged to the F District Team of the Sungsung Police Station F District, dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112 due to the interference with the above duties, and the Inspector G “I am off, I am off, I am off,”

C. Does such farch police officer

" 등으로 욕설을 하고, 양손으로 경위 G의 멱살을 잡아 밀치고, 주먹으로 가슴 부위를 4회 때리고, 발로 허벅지 부위를 1회 찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. On October 5, 2018, the Defendant was asked of a question from the head of the police station FJ forces in the U.S. who was dispatched to the site after receiving a fire report at the Defendant’s house located in Daejeon U.S. H 201 on October 5, 2018, as to the reason why the Defendant avoided from the head of the police station FJ forces who was dispatched to the site after receiving a fire report at the Defendant’s house located in Daejeon U.S. H 201 on October 5, 2018.

The bit of bitch bitch shall be discarded by the death of the bitch.

"To make a bath by others, etc., the flusium I's flusium was 2 times the flusium, and the flusium was tightly pushed down by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to I, G and J;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. On-site photographs and images of CCTV images taken;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (Interference with business);