logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.11.24 2017고합172
강제추행
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On May 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed an indecent act by force against the victim in a manner that, around 17:30 on May 16, 2017, the Defendant: (b) operated a driving stand in the steering part of the D Specialized Driving Schools D Specialized Driving Schools located in Seojin-gu, Seojin-gu; (c) EXF car, a vehicle driving along the road, EXF car, fluened on the steering part of the driver’s seat; (d) fluenced on the part of the victim E (string, 24 years old); (e) fluencing the Defendant’s upper part of the victim’s chest, and fluencing the victim’s upper part into the left part of the victim’s breast part of the motor vehicle in one contact with the victim’s right part of the motor vehicle.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel did not have any physical contact with the victim, and even if they had physical contact, there was a physical contact.

Even if it causes sexual humiliation or aversion to the public objectively, and it does not constitute an indecent act against good sexual morality, that is, it does not constitute an indecent act, and there was no intention to compel indecent act.

As such, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the records of the instant case, the evidence alone presented by the prosecutor was an indecent act by force against the victim as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

The recognition is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

1) The Defendant consistently denied the victim’s indecent act at an investigative agency up to this court.

2) However, the victim’s statement, the only evidence consistent with the facts charged of the instant case, which is the only evidence, was made by mistake as to the part that is difficult to perceive if the victim was a indecent act with the truth as follows.

It is difficult to believe and easily, without consistency, such as referred to.

First of all, among the facts charged in the instant case, the part that “the defendant's upper arms have been divided into two chests of the victim by extending to one time while controlling the driver's seat, etc. of the victim.”

arrow