1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. On September 12, 2007, the Intervenor was established for the purpose of the business and service business with respect to telecommunications services, etc., and was employed by approximately 30 full-time workers on the buildings in the south-nam City and the second floor. 2) The “D Trade Union” (hereinafter “instant trade union”) is a trade union established on December 11, 2009 and established on December 11, 2009, has its principal office in Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, and is subject to the organization of workers at the workplace nationwide with the Federation of the Korean Democratic Trade Union as a superior organization. The Intervenor has the F non-regular Party G branch office.

(3) On January 2, 2011, the Plaintiff joined the Intervenor Company and engaged in business related to the Internet and communications, and is in charge of the Director General of Policy of the Branch of this case. (B) The Intervenor’s complaint and disciplinary action against the Plaintiff; (a) The Plaintiff, along with H, the head of the F non-regular education and publicity department of the instant trade union, conducted one loget demonstration, one hour a day, putting the following in turn at the head office office office of the International Company on March 28, 201 and 30 of the same month (hereinafter “instant demonstration”).

() The J Home Center's order of fine on the violation of the Labor Standards Act to the J Home Center's head head. However, the case where the responsibility management of the J Home Center's head f, K Group's head f, and L Group's head f, now, is maintained, and the case where the J Home Center's human rights pressure, labor pressure, and labor pressure is responsible, and the case where the J Home Center's illegal monitoring agency of HOE CCTV, YM CCTV's illegal surveillance, BHOE CCTV's illegal surveillance, Do office, and unfair disciplinary action (nobbbation of union head f, which directly takes responsibility of the original head f of the J Home Center's head 2015, which refuses to go alone, the case constitutes defamation of this case on April 1, 2016, and the case where the plaintiff was responsible for the damage of this case on April 1, 2015 and the case where the intervenor was working on January 1, 2015.