A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 18:45 on April 5, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim's face four times by drinking the victim's face while drinking together with D (52 years of age) at a "C" restaurant located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul.

around 14:47 on June 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) operated by the Victim F (F) in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E on June 18, 2016, and the Defendant was able to lend money to the victim, and (b) was refused to do so, and then the second floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd class of the 2nd class of the 2nd class of the 2nd class of the 2nd class of the 2nd class of the 2nd class of the 2016.

“I hear the word of “,” and with a knife (34cm in length) that is a dangerous object in one’s own room, and with the victim “I am gue of any second floor,” and with the victim’s death.

The term "a threat to who is one of them" was threatened.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 3477"

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. A photograph of CCTV images to be cut-off 5721;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against the F;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol and the statutes on the list of seizure;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 260 (1), 284, and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of each imprisonment with prison labor) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Even though the reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act was already punished by the previous force, the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime is not good.

However, the sentence was determined by comprehensively taking into account the fact that a special intimidation victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, circumstances after the crime, family relation, and various sentencing conditions shown in the change theory.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.