beta
Text
1. It is confirmed that the right to lease the real estate stated in paragraph 5 of the attached list of the defendant does not exist.
2...
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. In early 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant were aware of in the course of performing the missionary activities of theTol church, and each of the real estates listed in [Attachment List Nos. 1 through 3 (hereinafter “each of the instant real estates”) on October 27, 2014, in the course of the physical display of land for the purpose of conducting the co- educational activities.
B. At the time of this case’s real estate: (a) approximately KRW 50,000,000, the remainder of the successful bid, approximately KRW 55,000,000, acquisition tax, registration tax, and other expenses; and (b) KRW 30,00,000, which are most of the successful bid price, were fully borne by the Plaintiff; and (c) KRW 44,000,000, which were most of the successful bid price, was covered by the loan under the name of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the instant loan”).
(hereinafter referred to as "the bid price of this case"). 【The real estate sales contract of this case / [B] intends to sell to A all the rights to D shop F in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.
At present, I are currently receiving 3.1 million won monthly rent for the rent of 70 million won.
Sale price is 1.2 billion won.
If the amount of KRW 1,20,00,000, the Korean Commercial Code 250,000,000,000,000 shopping district deposit 70,000,000,0000,0000 additional discount discount 87,000,000,0000,0000,000 or 30,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, commercial deposit, 70,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,0.
C. After December 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to purchase the real estate listed in paragraph (4) of the attached Table No. 4 (hereinafter “instant D shop”) owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) at KRW 1,200,000,000 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and around that time, the Defendant leased the real estate listed in paragraph (5) of the attached Table No. 5 (hereinafter “instant E-dong Housing”) owned by the Plaintiff at KRW 250,000.