logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.08.31 2016나1151
보증금반환 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.

In addition to adding the following judgments at the end of a port, the reasoning of the first instance judgment is the same as that of the first instance judgment, and thus, it is quoted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The facts that the Defendant received KRW 30,00,000 from the Plaintiff and D were led to a confession on the third date for pleading of the first instance court of the first instance, but revoked it on the date for pleading of the first instance court of the first instance. However, it is not sufficient to recognize that the confession was made against the truth and due to mistake, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the revocation of confession is not effective.

【】

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow