The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the instant traffic accident of erroneous determination of facts, the victim cannot be deemed to have suffered bodily injury, and even if the result of the victim’s injury occurred, even if the Defendant was unable to repair the victim’s body condition and intent to repair the damaged vehicle immediately after the accident, it was difficult for the Defendant to recognize the occurrence of the victim’s injury on the ground that the victim was fine and failed to repair the damaged vehicle.

Therefore, since the defendant did not have a duty to take relief measures against the defendant, even if the defendant left the traffic accident site of this case, it does not constitute escape.

B. At the time of the instant crime, the Defendant was in a state of mental and physical disability due to the difficulties in the state of damage, recovery, appraisal, and shocking.

2. Determination

A. On July 4, 2013, the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car. The Defendant, at around 15:30 on July 4, 2013, was driving the said car at a 95-lane-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-do.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the climatic salt, etc. for about two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, approximately KRW 320,100, such as the replacement of the climatic light.