1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 67,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from May 20, 2016 to the date of full payment.

1. The Plaintiff’s loan of KRW 67 million, in total, to the Defendant, KRW 10 million on October 2, 2014, KRW 16,5 million on November 16, 2014, KRW 15 million on April 23, 2015, and KRW 67 million on March 4, 2016, without setting the due date for repayment, may be recognized if the Plaintiff neglected the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the entries in the evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 4.

According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 67 million and the amount of delay damages calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from May 20, 2016 to the date of full payment, which is the day following the day on which the Plaintiff requested the return of the amount of the loan and the day on which the copy of the instant complaint was served to the Defendant.

2. The defendant's assertion does not borrow the above money from the plaintiff, but asserts that the defendant was paid for the examination and treatment of the plaintiff's child and distance consultation through telephone as a psychological counselor. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the defendant's assertion. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.