All appeals filed by the Defendants and the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the Defendants’ respective punishment (the imprisonment of Defendant A and June, the imprisonment of Defendant B, the imprisonment of 8 months, the imprisonment of Defendant C and six months, the imprisonment of 2 years, the imprisonment of Defendant D and E, the imprisonment of 2 years, the observation of protection, and the community service order of 160 hours) declared by the court below against the Defendants are unfair, and the prosecutor asserts that each punishment of the Defendants imposed by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination

A. The crime of opening and operating an illegal sports gambling site, such as the instant case, is highly likely to cause social harm and injury, by promoting a speculative spirit and impairing the awareness of sound labor.

The gambling using such illegal sports gambling sites seems to continue to go across our society.

These crimes, like shown in this case, are often carried out by establishing a server and a site operation organization in a foreign country and by inviting participants through the branch, so it is not easy to regulate them.

Considering these circumstances, it is necessary to punish the participants in the crime.

B. Defendant A, as the principal offender of the instant case, was a person who opened an illegal sports gambling site to exercise overall control over, operate, and enjoy most of profits.

The crime of this case is close to one year, and the amount of money received under the name of betting and the amount of profits excluding the money distributed to the members is very large.

Defendant, via Cambodia, took part in Defendant B, C, D, E, etc., who took part in the crime of this case in Vietnam.

The Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, and the Defendant had met the instant crime even during the period of the suspension of the execution, and the Defendant had met the instant crime, and there is a very heavy liability for the crime and high risk of recidivism.

I would like to say.

However, the defendant is both aware of and reflect on the crime of this case.