Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant B (1) around 11:00 on December 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) dismissed the victim from office at the Gangnam Labor Association in front of the entrance of the E branch of the E branch of the church located in Gangwon-si; (b) committed an assault against the victim’s right-hand arms with defective descendants; (c) on January 18:50 on January 6, 2016, the Defendant: (d) obstructed the victim from entering the church within the entrance of the same place as the above 1) and obstructed the victim from entering the entrance; (d) even though he was required to pay attention not to have another person’s body injured at the entrance, the Defendant 2nded the victim’s son and son at the entrance of the E branch of the church. Accordingly, the Defendant 2nded the victim of the assault, who was subject to the removal from office at the Gangwon Labor Association; and (d) obstructed the victim from leaving the entrance of the said church beyond one’s own time and place.

2. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the facts charged against Defendant B cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed intent of the victim, respectively, as a crime falling under Articles 260(1) and 266(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

Since all victims expressed their intention not to punish the Defendants after the prosecution of this case was instituted, the prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.