1. The defendant is based on the sale on April 1, 2007 as to the motor vehicles listed in the separate sheet from the plaintiff.

A person who takes over a registered motor vehicle shall apply for the registration of transfer of the ownership of the motor vehicle to the Mayor/Do Governor, and where the transferee of the motor vehicle fails to apply for the registration of transfer, the owner recorded in the register may apply for

(1) Article 12(1) and (4) of the Automobile Management Act (Article 12(1) of the Automobile Management Act). In full view of the purport of the argument in the statement No. 1 of the case, the Plaintiff newly registered the automobile under the name of the Plaintiff on November 26, 2004 (hereinafter “instant automobile”). The Plaintiff is recognized to have delivered the instant automobile to the Non-Party Non-Party Non-Party’s non-Party’s non-party name along with the documents necessary for the registration of the transfer of ownership, and the fact that the Defendant received payment in lieu of the instant automobile from Non-Party C around July 2012 is the Defendant.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to take over the transfer registration procedure for the motor vehicle of this case from the plaintiff entered in the register as the owner by filing the lawsuit of this case seeking the transfer registration of ownership on the motor vehicle of this case (al.e., it is reasonable to deem that the plaintiff ratified the above disposal act by filing the lawsuit of this case seeking the transfer registration of ownership on the motor vehicle of this case).

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.