A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives BYF YFLA car.

피고인은 2014. 7. 19. 16:30경 경산시 중방동에 있는 경산시청 앞 도로에서 위 차량의 교통사고 신고를 받고 출동한 경산경찰서 C파출소 소속 경위 D, 경사 E으로부터 얼굴이 붉고 술 냄새가 나며 음주감지기에 음주반응이 확인되는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 자동차를 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 음주측정기에 호흡을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 3회에 걸쳐 요구받았으나 모두 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 등 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정 요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on actions taken against an employer, and report on the status of an employer-employed driver;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (as to noise measurement and refusal to affix seals);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of penalty, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant has been punished once due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement of noise), and again refuses to take a drinking again, and the liability of the defendant is not less vulnerable, but the defendant's mistake is divided and reflected, the defendant has no criminal record of suspended execution or more, the defendant has no criminal record of suspended execution or more, and all kinds of conditions for sentencing, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered