A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 25, 2012, the defendant is a person elected as the president of the Housing Reconstruction Project Association Association in Mapo-si C and D located in Mapo-si.

Where an owner of land, etc. requests perusal or reproduction of documents and related materials concerning the implementation of a rearrangement project, the project implementer shall comply with such request within 15 days.

Nevertheless, on December 31, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the office of the Sinpo-si, F.B. 201 E Housing Reconstruction Project Association (201); (b) G, H, I, and J, the owner of the land of the said project; (c) a contract for the selection of the service company; and (d) April 28, 2012;

8. On December 7, 198, the minutes of the extraordinary general meeting were rejected even after the receipt of the content-certified mail requesting perusal and duplication of documents, including the minutes of the extraordinary general meeting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on complaint (including attached parts, such as a copy of a certificate of delivery of mail);

1. Article 86 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, and Articles 86 subparagraph 6 and 81 (6) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's act constitutes a mistake in law, i.e., a mistake in a case where the defendant's act under Article 16 of the Criminal Act is mistaken that it does not constitute a crime under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

However, a misunderstanding that one's act under Article 16 of the Criminal Act does not constitute a crime under the Acts and subordinate statutes shall not be punishable only when the misunderstanding is based on justifiable grounds. It does not mean simple legal sites, but generally constitute a crime, but it is erroneous in recognition that it does not constitute a crime due to a special circumstance, and that such misunderstanding is not permitted by the Acts and subordinate statutes, and that there is a justifiable reason for such misunderstanding.