beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) around 13:00 on January 2, 2017, at the first floor of the new construction site of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Housing Construction Site B; (b) caused daily wages at the above site; (c) caused chemical dust on the ground that the site manager did not go to telephone, but did not go to the site manager; (d) caused public danger by putting the gas on the suspended floor of the gas, etc. and setting it out by fire; and (e) was on the side of the fire.
C Moved to the pipe of cold and hot water managed by C, and 500,000 won was charged with two cooling water pipes.
2. The Defendant asserts that the discontinuance, etc. was collected and the fire was not attached to the floor, and that the Defendant was merely put in and added a stop to an empty liter in which other figures were fluent to avoid drilling, and that the Defendant was fluent by a cause not known between the fluor and the fluoring.
The facts and circumstances that the court adopted and investigated, together with the arguments of the defendant, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone that the facts charged in this case were proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt.
It is difficult to see it.
1. A witness D and E have observed a situation after a fire, but failed to witness the first outbreak situation.
(2) According to the witness E's testimony, it is recognized that he/she had a link with his/her view to the scene at the time.
In view of field photographs and field photographs, it is recognized that the page page, the Defendant claimed, was immediately adjacent to the point of origin.
③ According to the witness witness D’s testimony, when the witness D went to the point of shotfing, the Defendant was committing any act that could be seen as having caused a fire, such as leaving the place where the tree sicks are cut, and at the time, D was trying to put the fire to the view of the Defendant’s behavior.
3. Conclusion, the instant facts charged constitute a case where there is no proof of crime.