Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On May 31, 2017, the Defendant worked for the said telecom while drunk at the entrance of “Curcom” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B around May 23:30, 2017

D and Moel toilet use-related issues were discussed between D and D and D's 112 reports, which led to the dispatch of the slope E belonging to the Seoul Southern Police Station, and even during the process of confirming the contents of the case, they continued to d and were arrested as the current criminal under the crime of insult.

Since June 1, 2017, around 00:14, the Defendant arrived at the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Northern Police Station G police station located in F, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and provided explanation that the CCTV from the above E does not constitute a video recording, the Defendant continued to request for verification of CCTV images that D assaulted himself/herself even though he/she explained that it does not constitute a video recording.

C. Along with the desire to “E”, the chest was frightened to the above E, and the chest of the above E, who prevented the Defendant’s action, was tightly pushed down twice, and assaulted by a larlar.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements by shots);

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime of this case, the selection of a fine (the defendant reflects against the criminal intent of this case, the degree of violence against the victimized police officer, the records of the crime, and other various circumstances shown in the argument of this case);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;