1. The Defendant’s KRW 36,155,950 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 4, 2017 to October 18, 2018.

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Urban Development Projects (B; hereinafter “instant Project”): Defendant: C publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 18, 2012 - Project implementer:

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on November 10, 2016 (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”) - Subject to expropriation: The following [Attachment] is indicated as “subject to expropriation.”

- The date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation: the Korea Appraisal Corporation and the Korea Appraisal Corporation and the Korea Appraisal Corporation and the Korea Appraisal Corporation.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) dated June 22, 2017 - Compensation for losses: as indicated below [Attachment].

- An appraisal corporation: A certified public appraisal corporation which has agreed to sell, and a Pacific appraisal corporation which has agreed to sell, the appraisal result (hereinafter referred to as "appraisal of objection").

D. The appraisal result of this Court (hereinafter “court appraisal”) - The appraisal value: The appraisal value is as indicated below in the “court appraisal amount” column.

[mark] The fact that 753,489,700,700, 79,700, 330,000 square meters (hereinafter “E”) of FF road 13 square meters in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu (hereinafter “F land”) in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City (hereinafter “D”) for an increase in the amount of appraisal by the court (hereinafter “won”) 76,257,450, 76,779, 900,500 52,450,450 522,450, 330,000,00, 790, 300, 300, 212, 800, 8042,50, 836, 750, 750, 8675, 769, 7505, 295, 305, and 13

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Unlike the appraisal of the Defendant’s assertion, the court’s appraisal of the summary of the instant land has assessed the approach conditions and environmental conditions at an unreasonably high level in calculating individual factors of the instant land E, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim based on the court appraisal is without merit.

(b)each appraisal body, which forms the basis of the ruling, in litigation with respect to an increase or decrease of one compensation.