The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around February 9, 2013: (a) around 03:57, the Defendant: (b) stored a studio, such as a spacul, on the floor of the E building owned by the victim D in the north-gu Seoul metropolitan area for the purpose of receiving fire insurance money from the victim D; and (c) attached a fire to gasoline, and made it more than 73 square meters of the total floor area of the said 73 square meters via the spacul.

As a result, the Defendant destroyed the above store on the first floor of the building used as a commercial building and a residence, which is approximately KRW 21,676,00,000.

2. The summary of the defendant's and his defense counsel's assertion did not commit a fire to the Furine.

3. Determination

A. The witness G, H’s testimony, I’s prosecutor’s statement, each investigation report (fire site photograph, estimate, appraisal report, and field identification report, each testimony of witness G, H, and H’s testimony at the scene of the fire of this case, which correspond to the facts charged in the instant case that the Defendant, who is an overview of the evidence, was fired against the FC, was found to be a fire-prevention witness at the scene of the instant accident.

In other circumstances, it is merely true that the defendant is a fire-prevention crime, and the investigation report (fire scene photographs), appraisal report, and on-site identification report are merely a proof that the fire in this case occurred due to fire-prevention, and the investigation report (attached estimates) report is merely a proof of the amount of damage caused by fire-prevention.

In the end, direct evidence that can prove that the defendant was fighting against the Fda bank is accompanied by the prosecutor's statement of I.

B. I, the probative value of I’s written statement by the prosecutor, was the same as I, at the prosecution, to go back from the Fdade, and I again saw that one male is going to the Fdale parking lot in front of Fda, and then going to the Fdale parking lot.

At the time of the back of a person boarding a rocketing vehicle, it is the same as the witness in front of the Fda at the time and before the owner of the building.