1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the claim of the Plaintiff A expanded by this court, shall be modified as follows:

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the basic facts are as follows. Thus, this part of the judgment of the court of the first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of the first instance, and this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

5 pages 5 of the judgment of the first instance court (hereinafter "the head was faced more than twice on the floor") are "the head was faced again on the floor by mistake."

On the 6th of the judgment of the first instance court, the term "this court" shall be read as "court of the first instance".

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant Foundation, G, and H

A. Defendant Foundation, G, and H’s liability for damages incurred) The action in this case is one of the action of the floor, which is part of the A’s degree of difficulty A(the level of difficulty at the A through F, which is the most easily difficult level of difficulty).

The action above may fall under difficult action for general students or students who are standing on the side of the body.

However, it is difficult to do to do to the athletes with the same experience as the Plaintiff A, and the physical team players are engaged in the action of this case by means of physical training or reorganization exercise.

Plaintiff

A was taking action as a reorganization movement at the time of the first accident of this case.

(See, Defendant G and H’s testimony of the first instance trial witness M and N is difficult to deem that there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance due to the following: (a) the Plaintiff’s instruction on the instant action to the Plaintiff in the course of the first accident of this case; (b) the Plaintiff’s instruction on the part of the Plaintiff; or (c) the fluoring on both sides at the time

B. However, after the first accident of this case where the plaintiff A faces head on the floor of the floor, the defendant G and H verify whether the plaintiff A participated at the time of the accident of this case, as a guidance teacher for physical assistance training, the plaintiff A can resume the same action by properly examining the status of the plaintiff A at the time of the accident of this case, and if the plaintiff A attempted to take the same action, it is appropriate to observe it at the close location.