1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is a company engaged in passenger transport service, etc., and the plaintiff was employed by the defendant.

B. At around 01:10 on May 11, 2007, the Plaintiff, at the Defendant’s business office located in the Dong-dong, Young-gu, Suwon-si, the right bridge was left between the two sides while the rear wheels of B was absent from the road between the two sides.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

The Plaintiff suffered injury to the left-hand slot of the instant accident, such as the high-speed on the left-hand side and the high-speed on the post-sapon.

The Plaintiff recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident and received temporary layoffs 9,207,430 won, medical care benefits 5,070,000 won, and lump sum payment of disability benefits 41,471,270 won, by December 10, 2007.

E. On January 8, 2013, the Plaintiff received an examination of the latter disability of 29% in relation to the left-hand slots on the ground of the heat on the left-hand slots and the high-ranking part of the lower-rankings in the left-hand slots.

(hereinafter referred to as the “examination of disability after the instant case”). [The grounds for recognition: the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1-5 (including the number, if any), and the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. The assertion and judgment

가. 당사자들의 주장 ⑴ 원고의 주장 ㈎ 이 사건 후유장해진단은 이 사건 사고 당시에는 전혀 예상할 수 없었던 새로운 손해이거나 예상 외로 손해가 확대된 것이다.

㈏ 이 사건 사고는 원고의 사용자였던 피고의 과실로 발생하였으므로, 피고는 원고에게 이 사건 사고로 인한 손해배상금을 지급할 의무가 있다.

⑵ 피고의 주장 ㈎ 원고의 이 사건 사고로 인한 손해배상청구권은 시효가 완성되어 소멸하였다.

㈏ 이 사건 후유장해진단은 이 사건 사고 당시 예상할 수 있었던 손해이다.

㈐ 따라서 피고는 원고에게 이 사건 사고로 인한 손해배상금을 지급할 의무가 없다....