logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.10.19 2014가합5820
제3자이의
Text

1. Defendant Pagin Co., Ltd., and AV Co., Ltd., on August 18, 198, the Jeonju District Court Decision 2013.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The pertinent Plaintiff of the parties is a trustee who purchased the land and buildings located AWC.C (hereinafter “instant golf course”) (hereinafter “instant real estate”), and registered the instant real estate as the owner of the instant real estate as a trustee who was entrusted with the instant real estate from the MIM development.

Of the Defendants, A, based on the Jeonju District Court Decision 2014Kadan2843 decided on August 21, 2014 on the provisional seizure of corporeal movables, Co., Ltd., the former owner of the instant real estate (hereinafter “C&A”), performed a compulsory execution against the goods listed in the attached Table 1 on August 21, 2014. The Defendants, other than A, performed a compulsory execution against C&A’s goods listed in the attached Table 1 according to the 18th executive branch court meeting of the Jeonju District Court 2013.

B. It is determined that the instant golf course was commercialized into the instant land in the auction procedure for the instant golf course, or the structure, etc. attached to the instant land (including golf course courses, structures, access roads, parking lots, road parking lots, conduit roads, landscaping trees, landscaped trees, treatment facilities of sewage, equipment, etc.) was included in the land. After the construction of the instant golf course, the land price was assessed to KRW 54,651,562,00, and the land price was assessed to KRW 54,651,562,000, and the land price of the instant golf course was assessed to be higher than the bid price

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 5 (including the provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to Defendant Dogin Co., Ltd. and AV

(a) An indication of the cause of the claim as shown in Appendix 2;

(b) Applicable Provisions: Judgment by deeming the confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) to be rendered on March 3, 2007; judgment on the remaining Defendants except for Defendant Pagin and AV

A. The Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the owner of the instant real estate.

arrow