logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.08.18 2015고단1667
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 12, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and ten months of imprisonment for fraud in the Gwangju District Court's branch, and completed the execution of the sentence on March 30, 2014.

1. On May 20, 2015, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim in the victim E located in the Naman-gun, Naman-gun, Naman-gun, stating that “I will transfer the victim’s license with the permission cost of KRW 15 million, since there is a permission permit.” The victim would reduce the amount of KRW 20 million, so I would transfer the permission to H, but I would transfer it.

The Defendant’s defect that “the documents are transferred and the documents are removed.”

“False speech” was made.

However, at the time, the defendant thought that he would use the money received from the injured party as repair costs and personnel expenses of another vessel, and there was no intention or ability to seek fishery permission from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim on May 25, 2015; (b) obtained a cash of KRW 5 million from the victim; (c) cash of KRW 10 million after the day; and (d) obtained a cash of KRW 5 million after the day; and (c) acquired a total of KRW 20 million from the victim.

2. On June 5, 2015, the Defendant against the victim I would purchase the victim’s L and L’s fishery permission at the K Office located in the GJ of Sejong-si on June 17:30, 2015, with a advance payment of KRW 6 million for the remainder after three days, and with a payment of the down payment, 20% interest will be added if the performance by June 15, 2015 is not possible.

A false statement was made.

However, at the time of fact, the Defendant had sought a fishery permit from M at the time of seeking a fishery permit from M, obtained a purchase price from M, consumed all of them as repair costs of other ships, etc., and only he thought that L's fishery permit will be transferred to M, and there was no intention or ability to pay the victim the purchase price of L and L's fishery permit.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above.

arrow