1. It is confirmed that the real estate listed in the separate sheet is owned by the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. The real estate listed in the separate list of basic facts (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) was assessed on January 15, 1914, and each of the instant land is not yet registered between the parties or may be acknowledged by taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings as a whole in the statement in subparagraph 1-1, 2, and 3.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff alleged by the parties that the "Ocheon Ri" registered as the owner on the land cadastre due to the assessment of each of the lands of this case was sought to confirm that the plaintiff is a community consisting of residents residing in Yangcheon-si, Yangyang-si, Yangyang-si, and that the plaintiff is entitled to ownership of each of the lands of this case. Accordingly, the defendant asserts that the property of the Ri/Dong belongs to the Eup/Myeon in accordance with the implementation of Eup/Myeon exemption on April 1, 1931 pursuant to Article 103 of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, and that the land of this case belongs to the Si/Gun under its jurisdiction pursuant to the Act on Temporary Measures for Local Autonomy (Act No. 707). Thus, each of the lands of this case belongs

B. In a case where the residents living in the administrative district of Ri have formed a community consisting of all the residents for the sake of common convenience and common welfare of the residents and used the name of Ri, which is an administrative district, and owned certain property in the public register, such a community is an unincorporated association and its property belongs to the collective ownership of Ri residents, and as an administrative district belongs to the collective ownership of Ri residents, and as an Eup/Myeon/Gun belonging to the local government, which is a local government, due to the enforcement of the Local Autonomy Act or the Act on Temporary Measures for Local Autonomy, etc., such a community does not jointly own the

(See Supreme Court Decision 95Da32051 delivered on September 29, 1995). In full view of the written evidence Nos. 2-1, 2, and 3 of the evidence No. 2-1, 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff is on the admission of the two North Korean Dos at the time of racing.