logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.10.21 2015고정789
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 18:50 on June 11, 2015, the Defendant driven a BV125-wheeled vehicle while under the influence of alcohol at about 500 meters from the Gu acid of about 0.082% (Smoking measurement) of blood alcohol concentration from the front of the new apartment in the new apartment in the summer-dong at the time of leisure to about 500 meters.

2. Although the Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, etc., he/she operated an automobile in which the term of the contract expires as of December 30, 2014 under the above paragraph (1) without renewal of the liability insurance, etc. and until June 17:50, 2015 in the state of non-insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident (1 report), a de facto investigation report, and on-site evidence and photographs of the traffic accident;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving under the influence of alcohol and report on the results of crackdown on drinking;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 148-2 (2) 3, 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking and the choice of fines), Articles 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (the point of operating automobiles which are not mandatory insurance, and the choice of fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow