Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 7, and 8, and testimony by witness C of the party trial, the plaintiff was awarded a contract with the defendant as KRW 36,253,00 won for the construction work, KRW 8,210,00 for the construction work, KRW 4,45,00 for the construction work, KRW 405,50 for the remainder of the construction work, KRW 308,50 for the construction work, KRW 300 for the construction work, KRW 40 for the construction work, KRW 400 for the remainder of the construction work, KRW 300 for the construction work, KRW 400 for the construction work, KRW 50 for the construction work, KRW 405,50 for the construction work, KRW 300 for the construction work, KRW 400 for the additional construction work, KRW 408,00 for the remainder of the construction work, KRW 3016,500 for the construction work.
B. On May 31, 2017, the Plaintiff alleged that he/she received a subcontract from the Defendant for the removal of B office as one million won for the construction cost, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this. Therefore, this part of the claim is without merit.
2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion
A. The defendant alleged the absence of an additional construction contract at each construction site of this case confirmed the total construction cost as a package order, and thus, it did not conclude an additional construction contract. However, the defendant alleged that there was no additional construction contract at each of the following circumstances, namely, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively considering the overall purport of arguments in Gap's testimony as to Gap's 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8, Eul's statements, Eul's evidence 7, Eul's witness J and C, and Eul's testimony at each of the construction sites of this case. The work under the first direction at each of the construction sites of this case is deemed to have been completed and work