logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.04.10 2014고합295
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for seven years and for two years, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants of the 2014 Highest 295, carried out as if Defendant A was an expert in a futures option, and Defendant B conspired with Defendant A to receive money and valuables from those who want to acquire futures investment by introducing them as if Defendant A was the highest expert in a futures option and as if they were to play a role as a secret such as driving of vehicles, receipt and disbursement of bank money, etc. with the assignment of a futures option.

Around March 2010, Defendant B, in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) against the victim I, advertised "J" at the cross-section in accordance with the direction of Defendant A, and entered its contact information therein, and received contact from the victim I around April 2010.

Defendant

B around April 2010, at the victim I's house located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, "to introduce domestic highest futures investment experts, but in order to communicate with them, the study of futures investment should be sufficient." It explains the concept of futures investment, and it has various knowledge about futures investment to the victim I, as well as the defendant A believed that he is a domestic highest futures investment expert.

Defendant

B introduced Defendant A to the victim I as a domestic maximum futures investment expert at a restaurant where the name in the original city is unknown on May 1, 2010, and Defendant A made it possible for the victim I to obtain a certain rate of profit each month if he/she has made an investment with a single person, and if he/she has made an investment with a single person, he/she may obtain a certain rate of profit each month if he/she has invested money in the original city.

However, the facts are only the basic explanation about futures investment through Defendant A, and there is no experience in directly doing futures investment.

arrow