logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.01.16 2014가단40610
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the building indicated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

According to Article 150 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act, on February 6, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the following terms: (a) the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant: (b) the real estate listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant apartment”); (c) the lease deposit amount of KRW 50 million; (d) the lease deposit amount of KRW 50 million; and (e) the lease period of KRW 2.4 million from March 10, 2014 to March 9, 2016; and (e) around that time, the apartment was delivered to the Defendant; (e) the Defendant did not pay at all the lease deposit amount of KRW 50 million; and (e) the Plaintiff did not pay at all the monthly rent to the Defendant; and (e) through the instant complaint, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the termination of the said lease agreement on the grounds of overdue rent for a period of two or more years; and (e) was recognized

Therefore, since the lease contract on the apartment of this case was lawfully terminated by the plaintiff's notice of termination due to the defendant's delinquency in rent, the defendant is obligated to deliver the apartment of this case to the plaintiff due to its restoration to its original state.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is justified.

arrow