1. The sentence against the accused shall be nine million won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On May 23, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of road traffic law (dacting driving) in the Daegu District Court’s support on May 23, 200, and on September 4, 2014, the same court received a summary order of KRW 4 million as a fine for the same crime.

[2] The Defendant: (a) was a person with at least two alcohol driving skills on May 17, 2016; and (b) was driving B Poter cargo under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.136% alcohol alcohol level from the 500-meter section to the front road of the Dag-dong 10-3, the upper end of which is the 10-3, the upper end of which without obtaining a driver’s license on May 17, 2016 to the front road of the Dag-dong 914, the Defendant used B Poter cargo under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.136%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Arrest report of the occurrence of the case, notification of the result of regulating drinking driving, circumstantial report of the driver of the vehicle, the ledger of driver's license, and the making of the vehicle register;

1. Records of crime: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports (Attachment to the same type of force), and application of the statutes on attached data;

1. Driving under the relevant legal provision on criminal facts: Article 148-2 (1) 1 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 44 (1) of the same Act without a license: Subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Although there was a record of being sentenced to a fine due to drinking, not only three times (200, 2007, 2014) more than three times (200, 2007, and 2014) as stated in the reasoning for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant’s confession and reflects each of the crimes of this case, the Defendant has no record of crimes exceeding the fine, and the driving distance is considered as favorable to the Defendant, and the Defendant has no record of crimes beyond the fine, and all of the circumstances indicated in the arguments and records of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered by considering the following circumstances.