A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 07:30 on March 29, 2019, the Defendant: (a) requested refund of the drinking value in D 1 room operated by the victim C (n, 58 years of age) located on the B floor B B of Guri-si; (b) but was rejected, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as a clock, which is a dangerous object in the first table table, twice the head of the victim; (c) was slicking the head of the victim’s head; and (d) was slicking the head of the victim’s head, and was slicking the victim’s head for about 14 days by drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. A report on investigation;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Two copies of the 112 Report Settlement Table; and

1. Investigation report (a statement by a shote and attaching screen pictures);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in Part II of the death diagnosis report;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act and the range of the recommended sentence pursuant to the special injury (type 1) and the mitigated sentence (a period of four months to one year, and special mitigation factors: imprisonment of punishment): Imprisonment with prison labor for six months to one year (the lower limit of the applicable sentence exceeds the lower limit of the sentencing guidelines in the form of six months, and according to the statutory minimum limit of the applicable sentencing guidelines), the instant crime committed in this case is deemed to have suffered significant physical and mental pain for the victim, not for the reason that the Defendant was denied a request for refund of the drinking value from an entertainment tavern.

In 1984, the defendant is punished by a fine not exceeding 100,000 won and a fine not exceeding 700,000 won in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act in 2004.