A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 5, 2018, at around 03:30 on January 5, 2018, the Defendant had avoided disturbance for about 15 minutes, including, but not limited to, “C main points” located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, seeking to find one’s own friendship that he had first returned home under the influence of alcohol, and had been able to avoid disturbance for about 15 minutes, such as “C heading ........” to the employees of the victim D and other employees.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main management by force.

2. On January 5, 2018, at around 03:45, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around 03:45, and at the time of hearing the case to the employees, etc. of the police officer F of the Seoul Southern Police Station Epic Police Station, who was called for after receiving the report of 112 due to the above disturbance by the Defendant, the Defendant expressed the back of the F’s head two times on the floor of the first hand to the police officer who belongs to the same police box, and expressed that, at the same time, the Defendant expressed him/her “to stick” to G police officers who belong to the same police box, sent him/her one time at the left side of G.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch duty of a police officer 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal report;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is that the defendant reflects his mistake in depth, appears to be a contingent crime, that the defendant has no criminal history, and that the defendant has no criminal history, and that the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the record are determined as ordered.