logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.24 2015고단5584
특수절도미수
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive is against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 6, 2015, at around 01:30, the Defendants discovered a drinking water plate that is managed by the winners of the names of the victims installed at the entrance of the toilet of the first floor located in the Busan East-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-do, the center of Busan-do, in order to steals money from the entrance. Defendants B and C reported the network side by the Defendant, and Defendant A did not commit an attempted crime because the key part of the key part of the key of the key of the self-reader machine prepared in advance is too sound that the police officer would go up at the Public Security Center located next to the Busan-do, and it was unlikely that the police officer would go up at the Public Security Center.

2. On April 6, 2015, at around 02:00, the Defendants discovered a drinking water plate that was administered by the victims of the name in mind at the entrance of the Hanjin Shipping Building located in Busan Jung-gu, Busan, about 9:00, the Defendants attempted to take money from the entrance of the Hanjin Shipping Building. Defendant B and Defendant C reported the network next, and Defendant A did not discover the key part of the cell line at least 6:7 times and did not go to the security guards on duty while serving on duty.

3. On April 6, 2015, around 02:30 on April 6, 2015, the Defendants discovered a drinking water plate managed by the victim E Co., Ltd. established at the entrance of the e store located in Busan Young-gu, and stolen money in this manner. Defendant B and Defendant C reported the network next to it, and Defendant A did not commit an attempted crime because the key part of the cell line of the cell board was known to the security personnel on duty while serving on duty.

As a result, the Defendants did not commit a theft of the victims' property, but did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and B;

1. Defendant C’s partial statement

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (Attachment of photographs, attachment of site inspection photographs, and confirmation and investigation of damage);

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 342 and 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

arrow