A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended execution on October 10 to a violation of the Public Official Election Act at Seoul High Court on June 4, 2015, and the said judgment was finalized on June 12, 2015, and operated a wab.

1. On June 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would sell the land and return it to the victim D with a good land developed within a few years after the lapse of a few years, since there is a benefit of more than three to four times after the lapse of a few years, if he/she lends 200 million won or more, he/she would sell the land later with the principal and interest of more than two hundred million won.”

However, in fact, the Defendant purchased the land with the money received from the victim (the Defendant sold this land around July 2014, but the sales price was used as full as the Defendant’s personal debt repayment and the other company’s investment loan, and the Defendant did not make full repayment to the victim). However, even if there were no profits from selling the land, the Defendant did not intend to pay the principal and interest to the victim.

Around June 5, 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 200 million won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant and acquired it by money from the victim.

2. On January 1, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would make it difficult for the Defendant to operate his business because there is no operating cost. It would be possible to receive KRW 600 million if the land of the orchard purchased in 2009 was sold, and if he borrowed KRW 200,000,000, he would complete the loan with the money previously lent, and would pay the loan interest.”

However, the defendant had no intent to pay interest on the loan even if the victim borrowed the loan to the defendant under the name of the victim, and even if selling the land, he/she wishes to pay the sum of KRW 200 million borrowed prior to the sale of the land.